With IT so pervasive in (and instrumental to) the operation of any large enterprise today, not much gets done without it. This means the CIO, as the captain of the IT ship, is responsible on some level for the success and/or failure of such sweeping statements such as "We need to grow top line revenue," or "We must become a 'customer-centric' organization."
"The CIO is not only in the hot seat but they probably find themselves ill prepared to respond to some of these new mandates from the board and the executive committee," said Brian Sommer, vice president of Field Research services at Aberdeen. "There's just a hole out there in the big lack of technology; we've automated transaction processing but that doesn't help us with the new strategic priorities CIOs have to address."
"The CIO's job ... is to deliver," agreed Wick Keating, CTO of American Management Systems. "And they're the ones that can say 'I'm sure the CRM vendor's salesforce told you this can get done in three months with people working part-time. But the reality is its going to take six months and were going to need a team of 30, and I don't have 30."
In practical terms what this means is the CIO is often tasked with projects they are ill equipped to handle. And, without any part in the planning process, they are unable to adequately temper board-level expectations about the time, resources and money required to make sweeping changes occur. To often, by those outside of IT, technology is viewed as a 'black box' that simply needs to be turned on.
Granted, the CIO is hardly the only bottleneck in any strategic corporate shift, but often they may find themselves to be one of the first. Not much can happen at a tactical level without IT's involvement. Most business processes rely on IT to execute and if those processes are to be changed to meet a new corporate focus, the execution of that focus comes down to IT.