With regards to electronic discovery, decision-making is slowly shifting out of the control of law firms and into hands of the corporate legal departments. And within the corporations, there is more collaboration being initiated between the legal, IT/IS and records management groups as they try and tackle the ever growing problem of managing discovery requests.
There is also shift in corporate litigants saying, We dont need to worry about assessing our readiness because we dont deal with e-discovery that often to We havent had that major case yet, but we can see it coming up in the horizon and we need to plan for it now.
What companies are really seeking are well-documented discovery response plans detailing all the steps that should be followed when they are compelled to produce electronically stored information (ESI). What, then, both IT and the general counsel need is a playbook to help guide their internal and external teams on the step-by-step instructions for carrying out each of the necessary tasks.
For the most part, there are three major risks connected to ESI and electronic discovery that companies must be prepared to address:
There are also many questions that must be answered when it comes to producing ESI.
Before attempting to answer any of these questions, its important to first determine what are the current practices around electronic discovery, where gaps may exist and what are the risks associated with those process gaps. In order to do this, a baseline needs to be established.
This baseline can help both the legal and IT teams understand what areas can remain unchanged and where immediate and long-term improvements need to be made.
The best starting point to creating a baseline is to understand the current people, process and technologies used for litigation and discovery response. For example, IT folks in a major chemical company felt they already had excellent control of their electronic information. But, when they completed an assessment of their collection processes it was determined that their current processes were not documented.
In addition, there were three major problems identified in their current collection protocols that were not in compliance with legal standards that could cost them dearly if every questioned in court.
All companies have an idea of where they want to be, but how to get there can only be answered once a baseline assessment as been conducted that covers all of the major electronic discovery processes, including collection, preservation, records management, processing, review and production.
The first step to establishing a readiness baseline is to identify the organizations:
The best way to accurately gain this information is through a formal assessment process. Having a baseline from which to measure and improve provides the starting point and establishes the foundation for effectively lowering electronic discovery costs, risks and time.
As an engagement manager in Fios' Discovery Management Services group, Vikas Pall is directly responsible for helping clients create repeatable and measurable business processes for managing electronic discovery.