No Panacea: The Vendor Hype Around Complete Solutions - Page 1

Jun 12, 2008

Pam Baker

“Business alignment” has almost become a mystical chant as IT executives everywhere try to conjure the magical power of technical oomph combined with business zing that will ultimately turn ideas and processes into bankable gold.


Vendors, of course, are highly aware of this quest and have souped-up their offerings in an effort to offer the perfect elixir. The vendors, regardless of the type of technologies they peddle, all call these new creations “end-to-end solutions.” But at the end of the day, are end-to-end solutions truly a philosopher's stone or are they merely snake oil?


“A lot of vendors position themselves to be end-to-end solution providers, but I have yet to see a true end-to-end solution that can address all of our needs,” said Maricel Cabahug, CIO at Yaskawa Electric America.


Does that mean that “end-to-end” solution is just another buzz phrase?


“While it’s not just a buzz phrase, it does mean different things to different people,” said Julie Craig, senior analyst at Enterprise Management Associates (EMA). “At this point, we shouldn’t be looking for a ‘complete’ product. Instead, assess a given product in terms of the capabilities it contributes to the broader perspective.”


Cabahug agrees. She said that all end-to-end solutions are weak or lacking in one area or another. “Bottom-line, end-to-end solutions can work but I would not call it complete. Rather, it is a work in progress.”


The key is to understand what your needs are and then find a solution that is solid or robust where you need it to be. “This is where a CIO's understanding of the company comes into play,” she said.


Does this mean that business alignment is still a manual job for CIOs? No.


“If a CIO can just buy an end-to-end solution then sit back and relax, then life would be good and they should return a big chunk of their pay,” laughs Cabahug.


Still, most CIOs aim for simplification and standardization, hence, the push for end-to-end solutions. Cabahug said she tries to leverage her company’s investments in end-to-end solutions. “Unfortunately, occasionally, we come across business needs that, at that time, our standard solution cannot handle without a lot of additional investments on enhancements or modifications,” she explains. “In those cases, we do bring in a niche application or technology but set expectations that it is an interim solution.”


Her motto is to “use it, learn from it, but don't get emotionally attached to it” because the long-term plan is to replace it with the company’s standard solution.


If end-to-ends are more “end-to-mid,” how do you use them to your overall advantage? First, understand the underlying paradigm shift. “It’s no longer about managing networks, databases, or servers,” said Craig. “It is about managing applications.”


However, end-to-end application management is a term with so many different meanings it is virtually meaningless. So, what’s the best way to really navigate the application management landscape? Craig said that rather than requiring a single product to be complete, see true end-to-end application management as requiring a set of capabilities that, together, yield insight into the “multi-dimensional application fabric.”

Page 1 of 2


0 Comments (click to add your comment)
Comment and Contribute

Your comment has been submitted and is pending approval.



 (click to add your comment)

Comment and Contribute

Your name/nickname

Your email


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have characters left.